20 Films So Shocking They Made Audiences Flee The Cinema
Many of us love a good horror movie. After all, who doesn’t enjoy being scared witless from the comfort of their cinema seat? Sometimes, however, directors can take the shock factor just a little too far, leading to audiences actually walking out of screenings altogether. Here we’ve rounded up a bunch of movies that caused audiences to actually walk out of the cinema in sheer disgust – or fear.
20. 127 Hours
James Franco may be considered somewhat of a heartthrob (or he was before all those sexual misconduct accusations, at least), but even he was unable to keep viewers glued to their seats in the most harrowing scenes of Danny Boyle’s 2010 biographical survival drama, 127 Hours.
Based on a true story, 127 Hours sees Franco’s Aron Ralston embark on a routine hike across Utah’s Canyonlands National Park.
Whilst climbing a canyon, Ralston slips, becoming trapped between a boulder and a rock wall. After countless attempts to free himself, Ralston eventually resorts to sawing off his own arm with a blunt penknife.
During screenings at a number of film festivals, viewers were left so aghast by the grisly footage that some audience members actually walked out of the theatre.
One critic later declared this to have been the most shocking audience reaction since The Exorcist.
19. The Exorcist
Speaking of The Exorcist, William Friedkin’s 1973 horror classic is renowned for its shocking scenes, and no “movie walkout” list would be complete without it.
With its sinister, often repulsive scenes of demonic possession played out in a quasi-realistic manner, The Exorcist was designed to shock.
Back when the film was first released, some audience members were left appalled by the violent acts the film depicted, but it seems the straw that broke the camel’s back was the scene involving the crucifix (you know the one).
The Exorcist has become notorious in the years since its release, and if you are so inclined there is even a compilation of outrageous audience reactions to the movie.
In Britain, the film became a notorious bugbear of James Ferman, former head of the British Board of Film Classification, who (entirely on his own authority) refused to grant The Exorcist a certificate for home release; it remained effectively banned on VHS and DVD in the UK until Ferman retired in 1999.
18. Reservoir Dogs
Quentin Tarantino has built a career upon bloody violence, starting with the shock factor right out of the gate with Reservoir Dogs.
Set to the bubblegum pop soundtrack of Stuck in the Middle with You, the film’s disturbing torture scene immediately set stomachs turning when it hit the festival circuit in 1992.
The infamous, widely parodied sequence see Michael Madsen’s Mr Blonde intimidate the bound and gagged cop Marvin Nash (Kirk Baltz) before severing his ear with a cut-throat razor.
Famously, even the King of Slashers himself, Wes Craven, walked out of a screening of the movie. Much to Tarantino’s delight, Craven later admitted that he just could not hack (if you’ll excuse the pun) the nature of the scene.
All this in spite of the fact that the scene does not show much graphic bloodshed, with the camera quickly panning away as Madsen makes the offending cut – although the aftermath is still quite unpleasant.
Director Ridley Scott’s infamous “chestburster” sequence caused chaos during initial screenings of his 1979 sci-fi horror movie, Alien.
Probably the most notorious scene in the space-set shocker, it depicts the forceful exit of an infant alien from the chest of John Hurt’s Kane.
The shocking, grisly moment prompted walkouts when the film first hit screens – and in fact, it wasn’t only audience members that were scarred by the scene.
Scott deliberately failed to inform cast members other than Hurt about what the scene would entail on-set, meaning their sheer horror and terror in the scene is largely genuine.
Apparently, Parker actor Yaphet Kotto was left so disturbed by the scene that upon arriving home, he locked himself in a room and refused to talk to his wife for several hours.
A classic from legendary thriller director Alfred Hitchcock, Psycho incited feelings of sheer terror upon its release in 1960.
Various media outlets at the time reported that viewers were left so horrified that some fled from the cinema or fainted in their seats.
Psycho subverted expectation by killing off its biggest star, Janet Leigh, only half an hour in – stabbed to death in the shower, no less, in an iconic sequence shot and edited in such a way to leave the viewer thinking that it’s more explicit than it actually is.
Word of mouth soon told of the film’s disturbing effects, with horror fans flocking to the cinema to try and withstand the horror Psycho depicted.
Perhaps more disturbing than the graphic scenes themselves is the fact the Psycho was heavily inspired by story of real-life convicted serial killer Ed Gein.
15. The Texas Chain Saw Massacre
Another horror film which took inspiration from the shocking deeds of Ed Gein was Tobe Hooper’s groundbreaking 1974 shocker, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.
Exceeding expectations considering its limited budget and inexperienced cast, the film proved stunning in its brutal intensity – despite the fact that, contrary to its reputation as a ‘video nasty,’ it features virtually no onscreen bloodshed.
Indeed, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre was so disturbing that, a year after its UK release, it was banned on the advice of the British Board of Film Censors (like The Exorcist, it remained banned under the orders of James Ferman, only to be passed with an 18 when Ferman stood down).
The film has been called the “scariest movie of all time”, and was declared a “cataclysmic terror” by horror novelist Stephen King.
However, many audience members were not quite so enamoured; some viewers who saw it on original release went so far as to threaten to sue theatre owners for moral bankruptcy.
Director Tod Browning’s Freaks would not be considered PC by today’s standards, and it seems audiences back in 1932 weren’t so keen on it, either, but for very different reasons.
Some viewers of the time fled the cinema upon seeing the “freaks,” who they deemed too grotesque to be featured on the big screen.
The cast members of Freaks were people with real disabilities, many of whom worked in the circus before they were given a chance at stardom.
Although the film somewhat defies the horror genre in that it lacks blood and does not rely on shock tactics, there are numerous scenes of a disturbing nature.
Freaks caused such a ruckus that it was censored after initial test screenings, with one woman threatening to sue after reporting that she suffered a miscarriage due to the film’s horror.
Argentine-French director Gaspar Noé is notorious for films that push the boundaries – and 2002’s Irreversible pushed things too far for the tastes of many viewers.
Irreversible is a French experimental psychological horror film, renowned for its being presented in reverse chronological order, as well as for its shocking scenes of brutal violence.
Most disturbing of these is a brutal murder scene early on, and a truly shocking rape sequence, both of which play out in real time without cutting away from the heinous acts.
During its premiere at the 2002 Cannes Film Festival, an estimated 250 people walked out of one Irrervisible screening, with many requiring medical attention due to the horrors on show.
Critic Roger Ebert described Irreversible as “a movie so violent and cruel that most people will find it unwatchable”.
In this French-Belgian horror flick from writer-director Julia Ducournau, a young vegetarian, Justine, develops an intense craving for flesh after she is forced to consume a rabbit’s kidney in her Biology class.
Justine does not stick to eating animal flesh, however, and is soon overcome with cannibalistic tendencies.
Raw is graphic in parts, with depictions of lacerated extremities and gaping wounds. These bloody scenes did not go down well at the 2016 Toronto Film Festival.
Paramedics were called after several audience members fainted from the sheer horror of it all. According to Ryan Werner, the film’s marketing executive, “An ambulance had to be called to the scene as the film became too much for a couple patrons.”
If you’re prone to feeling weak at the sight of blood, then, we’d recommend you give this one a miss…
11. Swiss Army Man
A far cry from Harry Potter, Daniel Radcliffe pushed some viewers over the edge when he played a revoltingly flatulent corpse in 2016’s Swiss Army Man.
Deemed a comedy-drama adventure film, many cinema-goers were simply left aghast when Swiss Army Man turned out to be more than just your average ‘adventure’ movie.
The film is decidedly bizarre, with a scene in which Hank (Paul Dano) rides Radcliffe’s corpse in an attempt to escape the island upon which he is stranded.
Things become only weirder still when Hank uses the corpse’s erection as a compass, a scene that prompted some audience members to walk out of the theatre in disgust.
According to Variety critic Peter Debruge, “this movie wears its weirdness as a badge of honor – as well it should.”
10. The Woman
This 2011 film from director Lucky McKee, based on the novel co-written by McKee and the late horror author Jack Ketchum, raised more than a few eyebrows on its premiere.
A semi-sequel to 2009’s The Offspring (also based on a Ketchum novel), The Woman of the title (Pollyanna McIntosh) lives feral in the woods – until she is captured by seemingly clean-cut, middle class hunter Chris Cleek (Sean Bridgers).
Cleek takes the woman home to his family and locks her in an outhouse, with plans to ‘civilise’ her – but the woman’s presence only serves to bring to light the hunter’s abusive nature.
The Woman had its first screening at the Sundance Film Festival, where it appalled some members of the audience and prompted accusations of misogyny.
The filmmakers and many critics argued that The Woman is in fact very much a feminist film, but this was not accepted by all, and the film remains controversial among horror fans.
9. The Brown Bunny
Actor-turned-filmmaker Vincent Gallo had enjoyed critical acclaim and cult status with his 1998 debut, indie drama Buffalo ’66 – and naturally he hoped to continue that winning streak with his follow-up feature.
However, when Gallo’s second movie, The Brown Bunny, premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 2003, it caused a sensation in all the wrong ways.
Starring Gallo himself as a motorcyclist on a road trip, the largely plotless film follows its protagonist from place to place at a languid pace, before a sequence towards the end in which Gallo is shown being given real oral sex by co-star Chloë Sevigny.
The initial cut of The Brown Bunny went on a full two hours, boring the pants off everyone present, even those who stayed to the end – although the aforementioned oral sex scene prompted the most early departures.
The Brown Bunny received utterly scathing reviews, with the noted critic Roger Ebert declaring it to be the worst film ever to screen at Cannes; this prompted a bizarre war of words between Ebert and Gallo, with the filmmaker later claiming to have put a hex on the critic.
Not to be confused with the (undeservedly) Oscar-winning 2004 drama of the same name, 1996’s Crash, from director David Cronenberg, left many viewers aghast.
Adapted from J.G. Ballard’s novel, the psychosexual drama starring James Spader, Holly Hunter and Rosanna Arquette centres on a bizarre subculture of symphorophiliacs – people who find car crashes sexually arousing.
The premise alone of Crash was enough to outrage many, but Cronenberg’s characteristically unflinching depiction of the story’s more lurid chapters resulted in many calls for the film to be banned outright.
Crash premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, where it attracted praise and scorn in almost equal measure.
Despite the controversy, Crash received the festival’s Special Jury Prize, with that year’s jury president Francis Ford Coppola hailing its “originality, daring and audacity.”
If any single film can be said to have kick-started the ordeal-based horror wave that dominated the genre in the 2000s (Saw, Hostel etc.), it’s probably Audition.
A 1999 film from Japan’s premier provocateur Takashi Miike, Audition is an adaptation of Ryu Murakami’s novel about a lonely, wealthy widower (Ryo Ishibashi) who holds auditions to find himself a new wife, under the false pretence of casting a movie role.
The man thinks he’s found the ideal candidate for the ‘part’ in Asami (Eihi Shiina) – but discovers too late that she is not what she seems.
The shocking final act of Audition may have delighted gore-loving horror fans, but some were utterly appalled, and the film’s festival screenings had more than their share of walk-outs.
At the Rotterdam Film Festival, it was reported that one woman in attendance screamed “you are evil!” at Audition director Takashi Miike.
As restrictions on film content grew ever more relaxed in the 1970s, it was in some ways only fitting that the decade should end with a biopic of one of history’s most infamously depraved figures, the Roman Emperor Caligula.
Appropriately, 1979’s Caligula proved the subject of much notoriety itself – though not necessarily for reasons that many of the cast and crew would have liked.
A lavish, big-budget production from director Tinto Brass, Caligula amassed a prestigious cast including Malcolm McDowell in the title role, and such esteemed actors as John Gielgud, Peter O’Toole and Helen Mirren in supporting roles.
Unfortunately producer Bob Guccione, publisher of Penthouse magazine, envisaged Caligula as a lavish sex film, ultimately going behind Brass’s back to shoot explicit sexual content (none of it featuring the central cast, of course) and splicing these scenes into the film against the director’s wishes.
Critics and audiences were appalled – not just by the content, but at how overlong and incoherent Caligula ended up being. It’s likely many of them walked out more out of exhaustion than repulsion.
5. The Tree of Life
Few filmmakers have attracted such early praise – before suddenly appearing to leave filmmaking behind altogether – than Badlands and Days of Heaven director Terence Malick.
However, though Malick made no films between 1978 and 1998, he seemed to be back to stay once his 2011 film The Tree of Life arrived, uniting the famed director with esteemed leading man Brad Pitt.
An experimental picture, The Tree of Life is at once a family-based drama, exploring a man’s childhood memories, and an abstract study of the origins of all life in the universe, dinosaurs included.
To say that the film proved divisive would be putting it mildly. On the one hand, The Tree of Life earned some rave reviews, and picked up a few prestigious awards, including the Palme d’Or at Cannes.
Once The Tree of Life went on general release, however, audiences were left utterly baffled and/or bored out of their minds by the slow-paced, ponderous drama, leading many to vacate their seats and demand their money back.
4. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
The bulk of the films mentioned thus far were always intended for an adults-only audience – but Steven Spielberg’s 1984 sequel to Raiders of the Lost Ark could only be a family-friendly affair, right?
Well, up to a point, maybe. But the point at which Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom takes a turn for the truly shocking comes once our heroes venture into the dreaded subterranean temple of the title.
It’s at this point that Harrison Ford’s heroic archaeologist and his companions Willie (Kate Capshaw) and Short Round (Ke Huy Quan) witness a Thuggee human sacrifice – in which a live man’s heart is ripped from his chest, before his body is lowered into a pit of lava.
Raiders of the Lost Ark may have been grisly at times (who can forget those melting Nazi faces?), but these were fleeting moments, a far cry from this long, drawn-out, overly sadistic sequence – and we haven’t even gotten to the later scenes in which the Thuggees brutalise our heroes, the pre-teen Short Round included.
Unsurprisingly, hordes of outraged parents dragged their children from screenings and reacted angrily that such scenes had been allowed in a PG movie – leading Spielberg himself to suggest the introduction of the PG-13 certificate later that same year.
3. The Blair Witch Project
It’s easy to forget now just how massive an impact was made by this micro-budget independent horror from directorial duo Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez.
Providing the blueprint for the ‘found footage’ subgenre, The Blair Witch Project is presented as the recovered recordings of a student film crew who got lost in the woods investigating an urban legend.
Word spread quickly that it was the scariest movie ever made – and much of this was down to the fact that, at its earliest festival screenings, many audience members were under the impression The Blair Witch Project genuinely featured recovered footage of real lost film students.
Some viewers, it seems, were still under this impression even when the film went on wide release, and as a result it proved more than many audience members could handle.
However, while The Blair Witch Project sent plenty of viewers fleeing from the screen, it wasn’t all down to fear: some were simply left physically nauseous due to motion sickness from the perpetually shaking handheld camerawork.
2. A Clockwork Orange
Few films have ever caused quite as much controversy as Stanley Kubrick’s 1971 adaptation of A Clockwork Orange, novelist Anthony Burgess’s bleak vision of a possible near future.
Malcolm McDowell stars in Kubrick’s film as Alex, leader of a belligerent gang of ‘droogs’ who speak in their own strange vernacular and enjoy nothing more than indulging in “the old ultra-violence.”
While the film has garnered plenty of praise over the decades, on release the reaction against A Clockwork Orange was almost as savage as anything in the film itself.
In Britain – where director Stanley Kubrick lived – there were widespread claims of copycat crimes, which resulted in protests outside Kubrick’s home and threats against his family. Panicked, the director withdrew A Clockwork Orange from screenings in Britain himself (this was not down to the BBFC, who had passed the film uncut).
A Clockwork Orange would not be shown again in British cinemas or on home entertainment until Kubrick died in 1999.
By 2017, Jennifer Lawrence was one of the most famous actresses in the world, so when she teamed up with acclaimed director Darren Aronofsky (Black Swan, The Wrestler), hopes were high for a hit.
It’s hard to say whether or not Lawrence and Aronofksy’s collaboration, mother!, had quite the response that they were hoping for – although if (as seems likely) it was controversy they were after, they got it in spades.
Promoted as a relatively straightforward home invasion horror movie, mother! proved to be an abstract Biblical allegory with scenes of violence which went a lot further than many viewers were prepared for.
Some critics were impressed by mother!, but many general audience members were left confused and disgusted, and walked out in droves.
Mother! proved to be a box office bomb, making barely $44 million off a $30 million budget, and Aronofsky has yet to direct another movie.